STORIES

1974: TWO PICTURES AND A PONY, Part I


Part I of a Trilogy


It’s impossible to look at a point in time without referencing other points that preceded or followed.  It’s impossible to look at one cultural touchstone without seeking others.  Everything is woven together; nothing exists in a vacuum.

In 1974 Chinatown came out.  The script has been called the greatest ever written, but the movie was not voted Best Picture in 1974.  Jack Nicholson has been noted as the greatest actor of his generation, but he didn’t win an Oscar for his performance in Chinatown.  Roman Polanski directed the film midway between the two great tragedies of his life, the murder of his wife, unborn child, and others in the Manson Murders 1969, and his own self banishment from the country to avoid prosecution for the rape of a 13-year-old girl in 1977.

As many tragic figures off the screen as on it, it would seem.  The film takes place in 1930s-era Los Angeles in the middle of a drought.  It follows the sordid lives of people of wealth and power as they ignore their own sins to focus on gaining even more power and wealth.  Even way too much of both is never enough, it seems.  The rarity of a common commodity, water, needed by everyone becomes the collateral for which fortunes are made and lives are lost.

Faye Dunaway drives a 1938 Packard Twelve Victoria in the film.  It would be the perfect metaphor for those who could afford the finest during the period.  The car sported a 424-cubic inch V-12 engine, the Twin Six designed by C.W. van Ranst.  A similar car was clocked at over 101 miles per hour, but Packard would only commit to a top speed “in excess of 85 miles per hour.”  Packard was as tight-lipped about its product as Faye Dunaway’s character was about her daughter.

Sotheby’s description says, “Most bodies emanated from LeBaron and the Murray Body Corporation, but while Edward Macauley headed Packard’s in-house styling department, along with Alex de Sakhnoffsky, Raymond Dietrich was the most influential figure. However by 1937 Dietrich had gone, and the custom bodywork was shared between Brunn and Rollston. The senior-series cars were updated with four-wheel hydraulic brakes and independent front suspension, in common with their junior siblings.”  Those details were all lost on Nicholson’s character, private investigator J. J. “Jake” Gittes, hired to confirm suspicions of infidelity.

Of course the infidelity involved quickly becomes just a sidestory, the real revelations being of a much more catastrophic nature, for Los Angeles and nearly every character involved.  Jake drives a more plebeian Ford, although about as top-end of a Ford as one could get in the mid-thirties, a 1935 Ford V8 DeLuxe Phaeton.  Still no match for a Packard Twelve.



In 1974, when the film was made, these cars were less than 40 years old.  It was probably easier to see the ’35 Ford eventually destroyed.  You could argue that by 1974 the innocence of the moviegoing public had also been destroyed.  The Vietnam War, the Kennedy Assassination, and the unfolding of Watergate in the press on a daily basis made the public’s mind fertile for a movie involving graft, corruption, abuse, and powerful men doing whatever they wanted to whomever they choose.  

Even a public hardened by events beyond their control had a hard time coming to grips with the fact that the heroine of the story had been raped by her father at the age of 15 and ended up giving birth to her own sister.  Perhaps that revelation, the undercurrent of every part of the system being corrupt, and the lack of any kind of a happy ending is what kept the film from winning more awards.  Maybe it’s the last line of the film, “Forget it, Jake, it’s Chinatown,” that sums it up.  The audience would do better to accept the way it’s always been rather than try to fix it or make it better.

Or, maybe the film that took home all the Academy awards fifty years ago found a better way to tell an equally disturbing story in 1974.




14 responses to “1974: TWO PICTURES AND A PONY, Part I”

  1. I was recently in HEB, in the checkout line, and glanced at the magazines and eyecatchjunk in the racks, and saw Mad Magazine/Santa – I’m a sucker for collectables, and grabbed it. Just a quick glance and -yes I bought it. After getting home, I looked at my receipt, and it cost me $14.95!!
    What a stupid purchase! What a waste of money!

    But, maybe I can use a word from BaT: perhaps it was a synchronic mind-dozing act.

    When I when off to college, and came home, my parents had sold the old home, and moved to their new home, and in the move, My collection of The First Three Years of Mad Magazine was GONE! So take that Mom & Dad.

    I think that Jack Nicholson is a great actor – because he’s not acting, he’s actually being Jack Nicholson, and we enjoy seeing him on the big screen! Like MM playing Lucinda in the CMC movie. Wait – I know MM is deceased, but muddle in your mind, and it’s OK!

  2. What was unclear about the film was what it had to do with the actual Chinatown. Any thoughts?

    • “Chinatown is a symbol for corruption, secrets, deals behind closed doors, the traces and dealings of a society that escapes the knowledge of the general populace.

      It’s important to understand a bit of actual LA history for that stuff to click. The film takes place in ’37, and in only a year’s time most of LA’s original Chinatown will have been leveled.

      The original Chinatown was a hotbed of crime and corruption, hosting opium dens and whorehouses. Being one of the oldest neighborhoods in the city lent it some natural urban grime, with some sections dating to the civil war era (Ferguson alley). Eventually the crime problem and general perception of the area led to it being earmarked for demolition for the construction of Union Station. Then the 101 plowed through the remaining segments of Chinatown. Only a couple vestiges survive today near Olvera street. The real significance of it as a neighborhood relates to Gitties awful time working there and his accompanying memories, as it was a disgusting seedy area which laid bare the true extent of the corruption of the city. It was probably his time working there which made him disillusioned with the entire notion of crime fighting having any real impact, hence the “as little as possible” quip, as that’s the only way to survive and anything else is frankly not worth the trouble.”

  3. The moment I saw this Packard I immediately associated it with “Chinatown”…which, IMHO is the best movie I’ve ever seen and have watched it over and over. Love the car…really love the movie!!!

  4. I still keep a copy of “The Sting”, 1974’s Oscar winner in seven categories, including Best Picture, but then Paul Newman and Robert Redford was a hard combination to beat. Admittedly, I’ve not seen Chinatown and have not been a fan of Jack Nicholson, other than his role in Easy Rider.
    Seeing the Packard ’12’ stirred memories of a long time friend’s 1938 cream colored Packard ‘8’ Victoria. He visited many, many years ago, and it didn’t fit in our garage, even if the trunk would had been removed. I was, and remain impressed. He still has it, and I still am!
    Political greed seems not to change nature over the ages – just differing ways to exploit, apparently.
    Feds in DC, Ft Stockton, New Orleans, etc.

    • Whew…I was thinking I was the only one who had never seen “Chinatown”. I do have a vague memory of reading the Mad Magazine take on the film, but that’s as close as I’ve come.

    • “Admittedly, I’ve not seen Chinatown and have not been a fan of Jack Nicholson,”; me too, Marty. I’m not a hater and have enjoyed many of his films, (eg. Few Good Men, Witches of Eastwick, As Good As It Gets), but feel his acting is widely overrated and generally over-the-top. I do think he brings out better performances by his costars and will try to see Chinatown soon because it does sound interesting. Also, I’d watch “Life and Times of Lucinda Lovelace” when CMC writes it and Jack plays Mayor Goodman.

      • Not sure about Nicholson as Mayor Goodman. The man can act, but could he possibly pull THAT off at this stage of his career. (Mayor Goodman, not Nicholson.)

        Of far greater importance is whom might be qualified for the nuanced performance of Lucinda, giving her the full credit she deserves, and capturing all the facets of her alluring character.

    • Despite the fear of looking like New Guy, it is incumbent upon me to point out the ‘The Sting’, while a great film in its own right, was the winner of Best Picture for 1973 rather than 1974.

  5. Now I’m not saying Fort Stockton is anything like Chinatown, but it does currently happen to be in a drought.
    And there is a person of wealth and power who ignores his own sins to focus on gaining even more power—Mayor Goodman.

    Finally our chronicler, participant and observer drives a plebeian but top of the line Ford too.
    But even Jake’s didn’t have fender skirts, nor did that high-falutin’ Packard.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Captain My Captain

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading